Leading Learning

David Brazer's blog discusses practical issues in education leadership while linking to theory and research

Staying Out of Solutions

Leave a comment

This week, I pick up the story of Sandra’s efforts to improve teaching of polynomials. Two weeks ago, I wrote about trying to get her some help from the math specialist working at the central office. When I called the assistant superintendent of instruction, she was rather intrigued by the factoring problem. She put me onto Antonio, someone who works in curriculum and instruction and was a legendary high school math teacher before moving over to the central office. I spoke briefly with Antonio and was impressed with his enthusiasm. That afternoon I provided an e-introduction between Antonio and Sandra, asking Sandra to follow up.

When I arrive at my office a little after 7:00 a.m. on Monday morning, hoping to take care of e-mail and voice mail before the day heats up, Sandra is pacing in the entry with a big smile on her face. “David, I had this great meeting with Antonio last Friday after school. We talked for about an hour and a half all about the factoring problem and the importance of Algebra 1 as a gatekeeper course. He was fantastic. He’d actually seen this method—the box method—of factoring before, but said he’d never tried it. He is interested in seeing how it might work with students and he had dozens of other ideas about how to strengthen our teaching in Algebra 1. I’m so excited! I can’t wait until our next Algebra 1 team meeting on Wednesday.”

Not wanting to dampen Sandra’s enthusiasm, I’m worried that she will fall right back into the trap of bringing a solution into her team meeting before her teacher colleagues have even acknowledged that a problem exists. “Come on in and sit down. Sandra, I’m so pleased that you had a good meeting with Antonio. I was really keeping my fingers crossed because often the central office can be unresponsive to teacher needs. I’d heard Antonio was different and I’m glad you’ve validated that. Let’s talk about a strategy for your Algebra 1 team.”

“What do you mean?” Sandra asks. “Let’s start by doing some quick-and-dirty analysis of the attitudes and capabilities on your team.” Sandra says, “Ok, well a bright spot is Kathy, my special education partner in the Algebra 1 inclusion class. She’s willing to try anything and she often takes what we do in my class and uses promising strategies with her self-contained math class.” “Sounds great,” I say. “How about Fred, Jane, and Carol?” Sandra groans, “They’re really tough. Fred engages in daily countdowns to his retirement three years away, Jane is a re-purposed typing teacher who got her math credential to save her job, and Carol often misses meetings.”

“I know it’s tough, but let’s try to de-personalize the situation and think about their interests. They all want to have a good day in the classroom, right?” “Yes, I’m sure that’s true,” says Sandra. I continue, “Let’s try a thought experiment. You can label each one of them as either comfortable with the current situation, in denial that factoring is an important teaching and learning challenge, or they are in a stage where they are trying to make changes and improvements, but aren’t sure where to go and/or aren’t having any success. Easy handles for the three are complacency, denial, and confusion.” “Sure, David, that’s easy. Fred is complacent, Jane is in denial because doesn’t understand factoring all that deeply herself, and Carol is just AWOL, so I don’t know. Kathy is the only one who I would say could be described as in the confusion stage.”

At this point, it is important for me to be supportive in my roles as principal and instructional leader. I need to be realistic and acknowledge that Sandra is working with a weak team without letting that be her excuse for her steamrolling the team or just giving up. I’m now into full coaching mode, trying to get Sandra to break the habits of an eager young teacher who believes she has the key to success in her hand. She may be right, but being right will not do her any good if she is unable to bring the more veteran teachers along.

“From what you are telling me,” I say, “you’ve got one willing ally and three others who need a major mind shift if your collection of teachers is going to come together as a team and improve the situation in Algebra 1. Do you remember the last time we spoke I told you I’d hoped that the curriculum and instruction department could help you mine the benchmark assessment data to see if there was evidence that factoring is a central problem?” “Of course,” Sandra says. “Did you and Antonio discuss that?” “Yes, in my excitement about his enthusiasm for working with me, I forgot about this. He said that the benchmark data would probably show a correlation between factoring and overall success on the assessments. He even thought we might be able to demonstrate correlations to Algebra 2, Pre-Calculus, and Calculus. The problem is that no one has ever asked for the data this way before, so it might take him a while to get it.”

Now we’re getting somewhere. “Sandra, this is great news. I would like you not to try to move too far with your team until you have the data from Antonio, assuming that he will be successful in getting it. For now, please put the box method aside. Journal about it to yourself, if you like, but I urge you not to bring it up with the team until they are ready to hear about it again. What makes sense to me for this week is that you will meet with the team and update them on your discussion with Antonio—without mentioning his enthusiasm for the box method—as a way of preparing them to engage in some data analysis when he has something for you to look at.” “Ok, but that sounds like a pretty short meeting to me,” Sandra replies. I respond, “I also suggest that you begin the discussion with them that we started a couple of weeks ago. You don’t have to get very specific, but you can tell them that through the spring you will want to engage them in a deeper investigation into Algebra 1 performance. Notice I’m not saying ‘factoring’ because they haven’t agreed that that is a problem.” “Sure, I get it. I’m starting to see a path forward.”

“One more thing, Sandra. You need to speak with Carol about missing meetings. Would you like my help?” Sandra thinks for a while and looks unhappy for the first time in our brief meeting. “Carol is just so brusque and nasty. I would like your help, but I don’t want to seem as though I need it.” “Ok,” I say. “I’ve made clear my expectation that every teacher will participate on at least one course team. Try catching Carol to remind her about the meeting on Wednesday. If she doesn’t show up again on Wednesday, then you will need to confront her and request via e-mail a meeting with the three of us. I’ll let you run that meeting in my office and I’ll be there to verify my expectations for all faculty. You’ll be in charge to the greatest extent possible.” “I’m not looking forward to that,” says Sandra.

Sandra goes off to prepare for her first period class and I open up my e-mail, thinking, “If it comes to a three-way meeting with Carol, it will not be fun.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s